Obvious answers with complex interpretations
That water is H2O is an established fact in chemistry. Yet in philosophy, this statement has prompted lots of debate and disagreements. By this I do not insinuate that philosophers question the scientific fact that water is composed of H2O molecules. But the issues that they raise with respect to this statement are quite interesting and difficult to resolve.
Hilary Putnam formulated one of the most famous thought experiments in philosophy: the Twin Earth experiment. Assume that we live in a time (as we once did) when we are unaware of the elemental composition of water. Assume also that there is a world that is identical to ours in all ways but one. The liquid that looks, smells, and is used as we use water on earth – and which is also called water there – is made of a compound XYZ instead of H2O, unbeknown to all. Should we say that on both earths, we mean the same thing when we talk of water?